Geriatric Nursing
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 370-376 , November 2007

Older Adults’ Functional Performance Loss and Adaptation During Chemotherapy

References 

  1. Chen H, Cantor A, Meyer J, et al. Can older cancer patients tolerate chemotherapy? (A prospective pilot study). Cancer. 2003;97:1107–1114
  2. Hayman JA, Langa KM, Kabeto MU, et al. Estimating the cost of informal caregiving for elderly patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3219–3225
  3. Knight MM. Cognitive ability and functional status. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:1459–1468
  4. Goodwin JA, Coleman EA. Exploring measures of functional dependence in the older adult with cancer. Medsurg Nurs. 2003;12:359–366
  5. Callen BL, Mahoney JE, Grieves CB, et al. Frequency of hallway ambulation by hospitalized older adults on medical units of an academic hospital. Geriatr Nurs. 2004;25:212–217
  6. Cohen ME, Marino RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures. Ach Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(Suppl 2):S21–S29
  7. Frick J, Unsworth C. Time use and importance of instrumental activities of daily living. Aus Occ Ther J. 2001;48:118–131
  8. Simpson JK, Rosenzweig MQ. Treatment considerations for the elderly person with cancer. AACN Clin Iss. 2002;1:43–60
  9. Heiberg T, Finset A, Uhlig T, et al. Seven year changes in health status and priorities for improvement of health in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:191–195
  10. Leidy NK, Knebel A. In search of parsimony: reliability and validity of the Functional Performance Inventory Short-Form (PFI-SF) [Abstract]. Poster presented at the European Respiratory Society 1999 Annual Congress; October 10, 1999; Madrid, Spain.
  11. Morse JM, Field PA. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. 2nd ed.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995;
  12. Appleton JV. Analysing qualitative interview data: addressing issues of validity and reliability. J Adv Nurs. 1995;22:993–997
  13. Dye JF, Schatz IM, Rosenberg BA, et al. Constant comparison method: a kaleidoscope of data (Qualitative Report 2000;4(1/2)). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR4-1/dye.htmlCited April 3, 2007
  14. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Choosing Interviewees and judging what they say: more issues in design for qualitative research. In: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995;p. 65–92
  15. Peck E, Secker J. Quality criteria for qualitative research: does context make a difference?. Qual Health Res. 1999;9:552–558
  16. Wallberg B, Michelson H, Nystedt M. The meaning of breast cancer. Acta Oncol. 2003;42:30–35
  17. Mackey KM, Sparling JW. Experiences of older women with cancer receiving hospice care: significance for physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2000;80:459–468
  18. Gignac MAM, Cott C, Badley EM. Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000;55B:362–372
  19. Skalla KA, Bakitas M, Furstenberg CT, et al. Patients’ need for information about cancer therapy. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004;31:313–319
  20. Massie DK. Psychosocial issues for the elderly with cancer: the role of social work. Geriatric Rehabil. 2004;20:114–119

PII: S0197-4572(07)00057-2

doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.02.002

Geriatric Nursing
Volume 28, Issue 6 , Pages 370-376 , November 2007