Elsevier

Geriatric Nursing

Volume 36, Issue 3, May–June 2015, Pages 212-218
Geriatric Nursing

Feature Article
Feasibility of a web-based dementia feeding skills training program for nursing home staff

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Nursing home (NH) staff do not receive adequate training for providing feeding assistance to residents with dementia who exhibit aversive feeding behaviors (e.g., clamping mouth shut). The result is often low meal intake for these residents. This feasibility study tested a web-based dementia feeding skills program for staff in two United States NHs. Randomly assigned, the intervention staff received web-based dementia feeding skills training with coaching. Both groups participated in web-based pre-/post-tests assessing staff knowledge and self-efficacy; and meal observations measured NH staff and resident feeding behaviors, time for meal assistance, and meal intake. Aversive feeding behaviors increased in both groups of residents; however, the intervention NH staff increased the amount of time spent providing assistance and meal intake doubled. In the control group, less time was spent providing assistance and meal intake decreased. This study suggests that training staff to use current clinical practice guidelines improves meal intake.

Introduction

By the year 2050, the number of persons in the United States (US) aged 65 and older who have dementia is expected to nearly triple, from 5 million to over 13 million.1 As the disease progresses, persons with dementia become increasingly dependent on caregivers, and often require nursing home (NH) care. In US NHs, 64% of residents have Alzheimer's disease or some other form of dementia.1 A cornerstone of basic nursing care is providing nutritional support,2, 3 and many residents with dementia are reliant on NH staff to provide assistance in meeting their basic nutritional needs. Mealtimes involve complex processes that encompass environmental, cultural, and social factors and are the most time-intensive of the activities of daily living.4 Meals offer the greatest opportunity for socialization; however, meals are often viewed as simply a task to be completed by NH staff.4, 5, 6, 7 This has major clinical implications for resident outcomes related to weight loss. In the US during the year December 2013 to September 2014, the rate of “long-stay residents who lose too much weight” was 7.1% – a rate higher than falls (3.2%), and pressure ulcers (6.0%).8 Malnutrition in the NH remains a major public health problem, yet over the past 30 years, research related to mealtime difficulties has been primarily correlational or descriptive9; research designs inadequate to alleviate this problem. Only one dementia feeding skills training program has been published, and was implemented in Taiwan.10, 11

In the moderate to late-stages of dementia, residents may exhibit aversive feeding behaviors (e.g., turning head away, clamping mouth shut) that make managing mealtimes difficult for NH staff.12, 13 When these difficult feeding behaviors arise, NH staff tend to rely on past clinical experiences coupled with personal beliefs, rather than problem-solving based on current clinical practice guidelines.4, 5, 13, 14, 15 For example, NH staff may misinterpret difficult feeding behaviors as “resistant” and cease feeding attempts. The consequences of this type of response for residents include weight loss, malnutrition, dehydration, and/or feeding tube placement.16, 17

NH staff are often not aware that hand feeding is the current recommendation over tube feeding.13, 18, 19 It is also not widely known that there are three hand feeding techniques: direct, hand under hand, and hand over hand feeding. The distinctions between the three hand feeding techniques have been published elsewhere.20 To this author's knowledge, only one hand feeding technique has ever been used in a scientific study, hand over hand, but the technique itself was not the focus of the study.13, 20, 21, 22 Direct hand feeding is widely recognized as an acceptable and effective strategy for providing feeding assistance to residents with dementia. For an activity that impacts the quality of life for so many NH residents, no evidence exists on how or when to use any hand feeding technique at any stage of the illness.

Currently, NH in-service training varies widely and is not necessarily evidence-based.23, 24 All NH staff must meet continuing education requirements annually; but the quality and focus of the content are not regulated. Barriers to evidence-based training include lack of staff development coordinator training, lack of access to evidence-based literature, and limited resources.24 Many NHs are gaining internet access for NH staff, historically used only for Minimum Data Set (MDS) completion, and web-based training is increasing in popularity.25, 26 Thus, web-based training on dementia feeding skills could be convenient for NH staff by allowing controlled time away from patient care and learning at an individual pace.27

This feasibility study tested a web-based version of a dementia feeding skills educational intervention, and examined the efficacy of the approach. The educational intervention (initially developed for home caregivers of persons with dementia),28 was revised into a web-based platform, and tested as part of a larger study (the Feeding Intervention In Elderly Late-stage Dementia), referred to as the FIELD Trial training.29 In addition to feasibility questions, we proposed that (1) NH staff who received this dementia feeding skills training would demonstrate greater increase in knowledge and self-efficacy for providing feeding assistance, and spend more time providing feeding assistance than control group staff, and (2) intervention group residents would show greater increases in meal intake and decreases in aversive feeding behaviors than control group residents.29, 30

Section snippets

Design

Two southeastern US NHs were invited to participate in the study based on similarities in number of beds, corporate status (for profit), and similar rates of weight loss for long-stay residents per the NH Compare website.8 The NHs were randomly assigned to intervention or control by flip of a coin by a remote statistician. NH staff and residents were recruited into the study. Intervention NH staff received the web-based FIELD training and group coaching sessions, and control NH staff continued

Residents

NH “gatekeepers” were agreeable and responded quickly to identifying eligible residents. Two different processes were used that illuminated inefficiencies in both. Full results of the process used in this study, and subsequent refinements to the resident eligibility identification and recruitment process are published elsewhere.30, 31, 32 The resident recruitment process used in this study took approximately three months, and created unanticipated research burden for study staff and

Identification and recruitment of residents and NH staff

Timing of recruitment of these two groups needs to be considered in future work. By initiating recruitment of both groups at the same time, the attrition rates for NH staff were affected. Researchers should anticipate a recruitment period of approximately three months for residents, because the majority of representatives preferred to have the informed consent forms mailed/faxed to them, and to review the forms over the phone prior to signing and returning the forms to the PI. The goal for

Conclusion

The implementation and measurement of outcomes of this dementia feeding skills training program proved to be challenging. When all meal observations were conducted at the same time, it was difficult to match enrolled residents to enrolled staff given the individual NH norms of feeding those who were completely dependent for meals in their rooms. Design considerations for future work include collecting meal data one resident at the time, working with a smaller group of NH staff, and enrolling

Acknowledgments

Primary author would like to thank the nursing homes, staff, families, and residents who participated in this study. Additional thanks to research assistants and Betsy Flint for creation of tables for the manuscript.

References (44)

  • W.B. Bonnel

    Managing mealtime in the independent group dining room: an educational program for nurse's aides

    Geriatr Nurs

    (1995)
  • 2013 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures

    Alzheimers Dement

    (2013)
  • F. Nightingale

    Taking Food. Notes on Nursing

    (1859)
  • F. Nightingale

    What Food? Notes on Nursing

    (1859)
  • M.B. Aselage et al.

    An evolutionary analysis of mealtime difficulties in older adults with dementia

    J Clin Nurs

    (2010)
  • C.A. Pelletier

    Innovations in long-term care. Feeding beliefs of certified nurse assistants in the nursing home: a factor influencing practice

    J Gerontol Nurs

    (2005)
  • E.J. Amella

    Factors influencing the proportion of food consumed by nursing home residents with dementia

    J Am Geriatr Soc

    (1999)
  • C. Chang et al.

    Feeding difficulty in older adults with dementia

    J Clin Nurs

    (2008)
  • Nursing Home Compare

    (2015)
  • C. Chang et al.

    Effects of a feeding skills training programme on nursing assistants and dementia patients

    J Clin Nurs

    (2005)
  • R. Watson

    Measuring feeding difficulty in patients with dementia: perspectives and problems

    J Adv Nurs

    (1993)
  • E.J. Amella et al.

    Mealtime difficulties

  • Cited by (25)

    • Knowledge of and attitudes toward assisting patients with dementia during mealtime among nursing staff in acute care settings: A cross-sectional study

      2022, Collegian
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the evidence of factors associated with knowledge of and attitudes toward mealtime assistance of nursing staff for PWD, further development of interventions to enhance such knowledge and attitudes is crucial. A web-based dementia feeding skills training module designed by Batchelor-Murphy and colleagues provides evidence-based information on mealtime difficulties using a three-pronged problem-solving approach: change the person (with dementia), change the people (NH staff approach), and change the place (environment), demonstrating a successful strategy to improve staff knowledge and self-efficacy about feeding behaviours, time for meal assistance, and meal intake (Batchelor-Murphy, Amella, Zapka, Mueller, & Beck, 2015). The training contains a 30-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation, followed by a 4-minute video demonstrating implementation of the problem-solving approach.

    • Optimizing mealtime care for people with dementia from the perspective of formal caregivers: A systematic review of qualitative research

      2021, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      It can be seen that the training related to mealtime management in dementia care still needs to be strengthened. In previous research, training and education have shown positive effects in improving feeding skills (Abdelhamid et al., 2016), and video-based training courses (Batchelor-Murphy et al., 2015) were a convenient way to provide formal caregivers with controlled time away from patient care to learn at their own pace. In addition, social network sites can be used as a new type of medical information dissemination tool to enhance education interactions in professional communities to share domain knowledge.

    • Mealtime caregiving knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors for persons living with dementia: A systematic review of psychometric properties of instruments

      2021, International Journal of Nursing Studies
      Citation Excerpt :

      The number of items ranges from 2 to 24. Three scoring formats were used: (1) binary scoring for two knowledge instruments (Formal Caregivers’ Knowledge of Feeding Dementia Patient Questionnaire, (Chang and Lin, 2005, Chang et al., 2006, Chang, 2005) Nursing Home Staff Knowledge of Feeding Assistance (Batchelor-Murphy et al., 2015)), (2) 0–10 visual analog for one instrument (Intention Scale (Chang and Lin, 2005, Chang et al., 2006)), and (3) Likert scoring for six instruments. All instruments had limited psychometrics, and five instruments were not tested for any type of reliability (Zahler et al.’s questionnaire, (Zahler et al., 1994).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosures: First author wishes to thank the generous support of the John A. Hartford Foundation Building Academic Geriatric Nursing Capacity (BAGNC) Scholars & Fellows program, the University of North Carolina Wilmington's School of Nursing J. Richard Corbett Charitable Trust, Duke University School of Nursing Office of Research Affairs, the National Institute of Nursing Research (NIH P30NR014139), R.A. Anderson and S. Docherty, principal investigators, Duke University School of Nursing, and the University of Maryland Online Dissemination and Implementation Institute funded by the University of Maryland and the John A. Hartford Foundation. Dr. Beck acknowledges that the study was supported by 1UL1RR029884 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Prevention and Control, the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

    View full text